The explicit test questions have turned over the candidates, and the Education Department can’t stand it!

　　Xinhua News Agency, Nanning, January 24th Question: The explicit test questions have turned over candidates, and the Education Department can’t stand it!

　　Xinhua News Agency "China Net" reporter Pan Qiang Zhu Lili

　　"Have you ever had sexual intercourse with the opposite sex?" "What is good about AIDS?" "Have you chosen the opposite sex idol in your heart?" "Do you want to borrow a good seed?" … … Recently, two shocking papers of Guangxi Beihai College of Art and Design were hotly debated on the Internet because of their explicit and willful examination questions. Why did the examination questions that should be serious turn into a thorough investigation involving personal privacy? Why can these seemingly "three views" questions, which have nothing to do with majors, enter the examination room? Where is the review and supervision mechanism behind the test paper proposition? Xinhua News Agency "China Netscape" reporter launched an exclusive investigation.

　　The shocking test paper caused online controversy.

　　On the 20th, two test questions printed with "Final Examination Paper of Beihai College of Art and Design" spread wildly on the Internet, and the test paper was circulated as the final examination questions of two ideological and political courses in the school. "Is it wrong to dream of marrying a wife?" Some of the questions are quite explicit.

　　Many netizens said that the magical examination questions can’t help but make people feel numb. Some people think that students’ personality is insulted, their privacy rights are violated, and even the proposers are denounced.

　　Have the questions been reviewed? What is the teacher’s code of conduct? The reporter of "China Netscape" interviewed the parties exclusively.

　　"The pictures circulating on the Internet are real, which is my question. However, due to mistakes in the printing process, ‘ Second-year thinking questions ’ Printed as ‘ Final examination paper ’ 。” Zheng, the executive director of the school, said that the "final examination papers" of the two courses had been finished on the 12th of this month, and the two topics on the 20th were additional thinking questions.

　　Zheng showed the reporter the record that he passed the examination questions to the work group on January 11th, and its title was "Thinking Questions for Grade Two".

　　The reporter got four papers from the school. From the "Final Examination Paper" on January 12, I saw that the topics included objective questions, subjective questions and judgment questions, all of which were outline contents. Li Gaonan, secretary of the Party Committee and education supervisor of the school, said that two "final examination papers" have been reported and tested as required.

　　"The two papers on the 20 th are open-ended papers, and there are no standard answers. Students can score as long as they answer, or they can give up answering." Zheng said.

　　Beihai College of Art and Design, located in Beihai City, Guangxi, is a second art and design college approved by the Ministry of Education. The school began enrolling students in 2000 and currently has more than 10,000 students. When the reporter arrived at the campus for an interview, the school had already had a holiday and few students were there.

　　Zheng said that similar examination contents have appeared for many years, generally for freshmen and sophomores, and will be adjusted every year according to the current popular social phenomena.

　　On 23rd, education department of guangxi released the results of the survey: the examination questions on January 20th reflected on the Internet were not the final examination questions of the above two courses, but the "thinking questions" of the first and second grades given by Zheng, and these thinking questions were not the prescribed course examination contents. "Thinking questions" changed into "examination papers" because the relevant personnel of the school were extremely irresponsible in their work, and two sets of thinking questions were printed under the title boxes of two final examination questions.

　　Education department of guangxi has instructed the school to make a written in-depth inspection and immediately rectify the existing problems. Zheng, the executive director of the school, resigned and dismissed a vice president, director of the academic affairs office and director of the academic affairs office.

　　Spying on privacy or reverse thinking?

　　The reporter got these two controversial questions from the school, including 48 questions and 53 questions respectively, covering sexual health, AIDS, personal feelings, comprehensive quality and other aspects. Students can answer with their real names or give up, and some questions do not need to be answered.

　　"The original intention of the question is actually to improve students’ safety awareness." Zheng said that the university is a critical period for students to establish a correct "three views". At present, some students lack awareness of prevention, which leads to irreparable consequences. "The examination questions are to stimulate students to pay attention to their own safety through reverse thinking."

　　"For example ‘ What’s good about AIDS ’ We want to stimulate students’ nerves and pay attention to sexual health and safety. " Zheng said.

　　The reporter saw from the test questions that the shocking and explosive test questions accounted for about 20%, and others included, for example, "What is the meaning of life?" "How to understand ‘ Serve the people ’ ？” "How did ideas come into being?" Waiting for a topic full of positive energy.

　　The reporter interviewed a number of students. A student majoring in animation in 2018 said that more than 40 students in the class basically answered the questions. Some students think that getting answers in this way is suspected of infringing on privacy, and some students say that "they are all adults, and their sexual health awareness can be improved through the answer sheet", expressing their understanding to the questioner.

　　Li Gaonan said frankly that the questioner was not malicious, but this way of asking questions is debatable. The school does have problems in proposition management, and some comrades lack a sense of responsibility. The school will learn from it and correct it in the future.

　　Expert: Personalized test questions should avoid being possessed.

　　Many insiders said that this incident not only exposed the irregularity of the school’s own working procedures, but also revealed that the relevant departments were not strict in implementing certain systems, the supervision was not in place, and there was a lack of guidance for some improper personalized examination methods.

　　Li Li, a lawyer in Guangxi Branch of Beijing Shangheng Law Firm, believes that it is mandatory to test by means of real-name questionnaire, and there is a great risk of revealing personal privacy. Problems in any link, such as the release of scores, the sealing of test papers, personal information, etc., may have adverse effects on students. "In the future, real-name registration system or examination should be avoided and information preservation should be paid attention to".

　　Sun Xiaoying, a researcher at Guangxi Academy of Social Sciences, said: "The focus of social debate is actually how to educate students in a more effective way. It is understandable that some colleges and universities engage in innovative teaching and personalized examination questions, but they should not be" possessed "for the pursuit of personalization, let alone abused. Understanding students’ ideological trends can take a more warm and flexible way, such as heart-to-heart talks or anonymous questionnaires. " Sun Xiaoying said.